Sunday, October 3, 2010

We'll know its the 1930's if they take the White House

Matt Taibbi strikes again with an entertaining, clear article on the Tea Party's psychological underpinnings. I consider Rolling Stone pretty mainstream, though I don't know its circulation these days. Gotta be reaching people who don't read Frank Rich, though.

Many quotable lines, this is just one example:

So how does a group of billionaire businessmen and corporations get a bunch of broke Middle American white people to lobby for lower taxes for the rich and deregulation of Wall Street? That turns out to be easy. Beneath the surface, the Tea Party is little more than a weird and disorderly mob, a federation of distinct and often competing strains of conservatism that have been unable to coalesce around a leader of their own choosing. Its rallies include not only hardcore libertarians left over from the original Ron Paul "Tea Parties," but gun-rights advocates, fundamentalist Christians, pseudomilitia types like the Oath Keepers (a group of law- enforcement and military professionals who have vowed to disobey "unconstitutional" orders) and mainstream Republicans who have simply lost faith in their party. It's a mistake to cast the Tea Party as anything like a unified, cohesive movement — which makes them easy prey for the very people they should be aiming their pitchforks at. A loose definition of the Tea Party might be millions of pissed-off white people sent chasing after Mexicans on Medicaid by the handful of banks and investment firms who advertise on Fox and CNBC.

Read the rest here.

This was today's must read from Yves Smith's Naked Capitalism.

No comments:

Post a Comment